Learning from Failure: A Pilot Study


Learning from Failure: A Pilot Study

Michael Lance Whisenant, PhD

Hypothesis

Humans are an imperfect Learning Technology and learn by failing.

Conjecture

Failing comes before learning.

Every time we fail, we gain experience.

Learning occurs after we fail, and before we experience Enlightenment.

Enlightenment occurs when the lesson is learned thus leading to an understanding of the learning process.

Learning is lost when the lesson is forgotten.

Memory degradation is when the lesson learned is forgotten.

We then fail, and the process repeats.

If true, then:

Learning occurs between failures.

Understanding occurs when our gained experience produces a moment of Enlightenment.

Understanding is lost when the original lesson is forgotten.

Memory degradation is a loss of understanding.

We then fail, and the process repeats.

Conditional Logic

HBBpCL

Fail ->

Experience gained,

fail again ->

experience gained,

fail again ->

experience gained,

Understanding occurs.

Lesson is forgotten ->

            Memory Degradation is a loss of understanding.

Fail ->   process repeats

Literature Review

If you were given the opportunity to share specific experiences or events that had occurred in your life, would you be willing to do so? Would you be willing to expound on your successes and failures to where you could state the following with a high degree of confidence: I learned my lesson.

Before you answer, know this: It will not be easy. Exactly the opposite in fact. This will require you to be honest, vulnerable, and at times, uncomfortable. It will require a tremendous amount of work on your part but know that the potential applications for this study are unlimited.

Final question: Do you want to contribute to the expansion of human knowledge and evolution? If yes, then this is your chance to ask the following question: Am I learning from my mistakes?

Case Study #1: A Tree Rat Becomes a Squirrel

The following case studies represent significant events from my life that caused me to change my behavior or way of thinking. These studies will be discussed with the intent to provide as much information about the event so the following question can be discussed, open-coded, and then answered via a 7-point Likert scale: Did I learn my lesson?

To anyone who has never had the opportunity to travel around northeast Texas, one constant that can be depended on is the number of squirrels that populate this area. Known as the Piney Woods Region, these critters traverse their natural landscape with ease and grace that can only be achieved by those who live among the trees. Growing up on the Texas and Arkansas border, we had a plethora of gray squirrels that populated the pine and pin oak trees in my neighborhood. Even as a child, I remember thinking that we had A LOT of squirrels roaming amongst the tree branches. Their small claws could be heard scampering on tree bark as they conducted their daily grind of finding food, burying it, forgetting, and then repeating the process. Were they burying acorns for their future survival, or for any squirrel who happened to find the buried food, I wondered? And how did they expect to find their food using a “needle in a haystack” approach? Yet not only were they surviving, but they were also thriving! Squirrel nests dotted the interwoven leaf canopies, and, in my neighborhood, there were few natural predators to balance the system. So, I decided to manufacture a control on a natural system that I deemed was not functioning efficiently. I decided to exert my influence on the Post Street Squirrel Community.

Soon after this realization, I received my first pump-action BB gun as a gift for Christmas. Now possessing the tool to accompany my will, I began to systematically shoot tree rats from my backyard, my neighbor’s backyard, and any who made the mistake of being within my 20/20 eyesight when possessing my tool; and I became exceptionally good at wielding my tool. With ten pumps of my carbine, I had a 50-yard range in which I was a dictator to those rats under my purview. I destroyed families, wrecked relationships, and ruined a community that, up until the arrival of my tool, was unaware of such a Destroyer.

Undeterred in my actions, and resolute in my will, I rarely retrieved my kills as a warning to those rats who continued to occupy my territory. One day while patrolling my yard, I noticed a nest that I had not noticed before. Feeling threatened at the arrival of a family that could build nests so quickly, I engaged my tool and prepared it for its purpose. Ten pumps? No, this is serious and requires max power. Fifteen pumps later, I stared down the barrel and through the open sights of my tool and took aim.

Click, Pssstttt, Thunk! Instant chaos erupted as my tool’s purpose found its mark. The tree rat barks filled the air as a member of their family was knocked from its perch and died before meeting the ground.

What happened next still rings clear in my head 25 years later.

Rather than scatter, one squirrel continued to bark, scream, and protest the nature in which its environment had been modified. I watched, listened to its protests, and retrieved the fallen squirrel from its resting place. I then double-wrapped it in plastic grocery bags, tied them together, and disposed of the carcass in the trash can.

I continued to use my tool and eventually expanded my resources to include rifles and shotguns. I increased my hunting area and introduced my presence to other tree rat communities in the county, with one major difference. My technology had become more powerful; hence I was potentially more powerful. Am I to wield this technology the same as I did during the Post Street Massacre? Am I still operating under the overpopulation directive, or have I crossed a line and become an indiscriminate taker of life?

Fast forward 5 years to my 17th year on this planet. My proficiency in wielding my tool is still sharp though I have not used it for its original directive in quite some time… These days, if I want to practice or remember the steps in operating my tool, I seek out neutral landscapes and do not exert my influence on the native population. These days, my purpose in continuing to wield this powerful technology is for peacekeeping. I tread softly amongst my surroundings and respect the communities who choose to wield their technology for the purpose of food, water, shelter, and air.

As a result of life lessons and/or experience, a shift occurred, and my directive had been realigned to one of sustainability, and not destruction. What a moment! However, was it a single moment that caused this change in thought? Or had this change occurred because of failing a lesson repeatedly?

One day, 15 years later, while working in my backyard, I thought back on my community altering behavior and realized that we had a lot of tree rats in our neighborhood and, wouldn’t it be a promising idea to modify this situation to better accommodate my wants? Thinking I had reached an absolute conclusion that did not allow for dissuasion, I looked through the scope of my tool, located an over-populator, and subtracted one from the overpopulation directive.

Click. POW! Thunk. Instant chaos erupted as my tool’s purpose found its mark. The tree rat barks filled the air as a member of their community was knocked from its perch and died before meeting the ground.

Instantly, I remembered the lone squirrel from my childhood and its displeasure in my behavior. I remembered its barks and its cries of protest at having a Destroyer in its life rather than a Creator. Why did I just do that, I wondered? Sure, there are a lot of squirrels in the neighborhood, but there are also plenty of trees for them to dwell in with little to no impact on my being. And why did I start thinking of them as tree rats again instead of squirrels? Simply put, when did my viewpoint shift again from that of Destroyer, to Creator, and back to Destroyer? Ashamed, I replaced my tool, double-wrapped the dead squirrel in plastic grocery bags, tied them together, and disposed of my sin in the trash can.

Two years later. I rarely use my tool anymore. I still possess the knowledge and skill to operate its technology, though I have not used it for its original directive in quite some time. These days, if I want to practice or remember the steps in operating my tool, I seek out neutral landscapes and do not exert my influence on the native population. These days, my purpose in continuing to wield this powerful technology is for peacekeeping. I tread softly amongst my surroundings and respect the communities who choose to wield their technology for the purpose of food, water, shelter, and air.

As a result of life lessons and/or experience, a shift occurred, and my directive had been realigned to one of sustainability, and not destruction. What a moment! However, was it a single moment that caused this change in thought? Or had this change occurred because of failing a lesson repeatedly?

            While working in my backyard one afternoon, I noticed my wife, dog, and mom, standing around a pin oak in the yard and looking at the ground. I walked over and noticed that a juvenile squirrel had fallen from the tree and was mortally injured. It could not move its back legs, nor could it call out to its family for comfort. My dog had to be restrained as his instinct told him to eliminate this creature that had fallen into his domain. The pain in my wife’s eyes was palpable, causing my heart to drop as I knew what had to be done. I would have to become something that I had tried desperately to not be. I would have to become a Destroyer.

            Knowing what was to occur, I told my family to go inside and that I would take care of it. I retrieved a shovel from our storage building and started preparing myself for what I was about to become.

            Undeterred in my action, and resolute in my will, I swiftly dropped the blade of the shovel on the squirrel’s neck, and rather than subtracting one from the overpopulation directive, I created a new directive. I would only be a Destroyer when mercy was required.

As a result of life lessons and/or experience, a shift occurred, and my directive had been realigned to one of sustainability, and not destruction. What a moment! However, was it a single moment that caused this change in thought? Or had this change occurred because of failing a lesson repeatedly?

I rarely use my tool anymore. I still possess the knowledge and skill to operate its technology, though I have not used it for its original directive in quite some time. These days, if I want to practice or remember the steps in operating my tool, I seek out neutral landscapes and do not exert my influence on the native population. These days, my purpose in continuing to wield this powerful technology is for peacekeeping. I tread softly amongst my surroundings and respect the communities who choose to wield their technology for the purpose of food, water, shelter, and air.

Methodology

The assessment question of “Have I learned my lesson?” will be measured quantitatively using the Human Baseline Builder scale (HBBsc), qualitatively via the Human Baseline Builder Survey (HBBsu) open-ended questions, qualitatively via the Human Baseline Builder Experience Factors survey (HBBefsu), and quantitatively via the HBBefsu scale (HBBefsc). The Department of Learning Technologies’ (LTEC) students and faculty at the University of North Texas (UNT) will, a) validate the survey/scales via content validity and face validity, and b) assess the reliability and consistency of the survey/scales via test-retest and inter-rater reliability (or inter-observer reliability).

Due to the seminal nature of the scales, internal/external consistency will also be measured in the following manner:

•          HBBsc reliability will be determined using Cronbach’s Alpha (CA).

•          HBBsc validity will be determined using Factor Analysis (FA).

•          HBBefsc reliability will be determined using Cronbach’s Alpha (CA).

•          HBBefsc validity will be determined using Factor Analysis (FA).

Due to the seminal nature of the surveys, internal/external consistency will be measured in the following manner:

•          HBBsu reliability will be determined using CA.

•          HBBsu validity will be determined using FA.

•          HBBefsu reliability will be determined using CA.

•          HBBefsu validity will be determined using FA.

After validation, reliability, and consistency is determined, I will serve as the original subject and score myself. Next, my colleagues will participate in the assessment and provide their opinion on whether I learned my lesson.

Part II

Secondly, I will submit my DNA to determine my genetic predisposition for certain diseases, inherited disorders, and potential health risks. The measure of my mental health will be determined by self-reporting scales such as: Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Five-Factor Model, Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).

We then could determine if we are a) learning from our mistakes, b) what human characteristics are present during the learning process, c) our physical baseline based on our DNA results, and d) our mental health baseline based on self-reporting scales.

With this information, we are presented with the following data points:

  • Our self-reported score on whether we are learning from our mistakes.
  • Our judgment score from two peers on whether they think we learned.
  • Our self-identified traits during the learning process.
  • Our traits as identified by our peers.
  • Our physical baseline is based on DNA results.
  • Our mental health baseline is based on self-reporting scales.

When presented together, we can potentially determine if we learned from our mistakes, and what agreed upon traits were present during the learning process. Also, we will know our genetic predisposition thus potentially identifying any future health risks that could impact the learning process. Lastly, our mental health baseline will provide a foundation for measuring future changes in one’s learning process.

We could then say that during the learning process, certain identified traits, genetic predispositions, and mental health issues were present.

Once a predetermined number of surveys has been reviewed and scored, we can then potentially compare learning, its subsequent human traits, and conditions, across a section of the population.

            We will then have a starting point on whether humans are learning from their mistakes and whether they are physically and mentally healthy during the learning process.

Part III

Lastly, in a follow-up study post-graduation, I will conduct interviews with my family and friends. This will serve in providing valuable, second-hand perspectives and thoughts on the research question as it relates to a particular event being examined. The results will be open-coded, and the emergent themes will be identified. A parallel phenomenology study will be conducted on cases where the participant being interviewed directly experienced the event. Thus, their point of view would be documented, and the findings could be used to corroborate thematic elements in this study, follow-up studies, or other similar studies.

Human Baseline Builder Survey (HBBsu) (see Appendix C)

Instructions: For this assessment, please be as detailed as possible when answering the qualitative questions. If you are wanting to conduct this assessment to determine your personal Baseline, write three (3) personal stories in which you can state the following with a high degree of confidence: I learned my lesson. Score yourself and keep the result confidential so not to bias your reviewers. Locate two (2) people to read your stories and determine whether they think you learned your lesson. Add the reviewer’s scores together and subtract your self-score. The result potentially indicates your degree of learning in the situation being discussed.

Baseline (B) Question

Qualitative

1) In your own words, what is the lesson being taught?

Lance’s Learned Lesson (LLL) Question

Qualitative

2) Do you think Lance learned his lesson? Why or why not?

Quantitative

2a) Do you agree or disagree that Lance learned his lesson?

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

Lance’s Turning Point Constant (LTPc) Question

Qualitative

3) Do you think Lance experienced a “turning point” or shift in his thinking that caused him to change his behavior? Why or why not?

Quantitative

3a) Do you think Lance experienced a “turning point” or shift in his thinking that caused him to change his behavior?

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

The Forgotten Lesson Conundrum (FLc)

Qualitative

4) Do you think Lance will forget the lesson he learned? Why or why not?

Quantitative

4a) Do you agree or disagree that Lance will forget the lesson he learned?

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

(Transition)

Human Baseline Builder Experience Factors Survey (HBBef) (See Appendix D)

Please highlight all that apply.

5)In your opinion, which personality traits were exhibited?

Extroversion: Outgoing, sociable, and energized by social interactions.

Introversion: Reserved, reflective, and energized by solitude and quiet environments.

Openness: Imaginative, curious, and open to new experiences and ideas.

Conscientiousness: Organized, responsible, and focused on achieving goals.

Agreeableness: Kind, cooperative, and considerate of others’ needs and feelings.

Neuroticism: Prone to experiencing negative emotions such as anxiety, mood swings, and irritability.

Ambition: Driven, determined, and motivated to achieve success.

Optimism: Positive outlook, hopeful, and confident in the future.

Resilience: Ability to bounce back from setbacks and adapt to challenges.

Empathy: Ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

Assertiveness: Confident and self-assured in expressing thoughts, needs, and opinions.

Creativity: Ability to think and express oneself in original and innovative ways.

Curiosity: Eagerness to explore, learn, and seek new knowledge and experiences.

Flexibility: Adaptability and willingness to adjust to changing circumstances.

Patience: Ability to remain calm and composed in difficult or frustrating situations.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by fifteen.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

6) In your opinion, which emotional traits were exhibited?

Emotional Resilience: The ability to bounce back from adversity and maintain emotional well-being.

Emotional Awareness: The ability to recognize and understand one’s own emotions.

Emotional Regulation: The ability to manage and control one’s emotions effectively.

Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

Compassion: Showing care, concern, and kindness towards others.

Emotional Expressiveness: The tendency to openly express emotions.

Emotional Stability: The ability to remain calm and composed in stressful situations.

Emotional Flexibility: The ability to adapt and adjust emotions based on different situations.

Emotional Intelligence: The overall ability to perceive, understand, and manage emotions.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by nine.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

7) In your opinion, which social traits were exhibited?

Social Intelligence: The ability to understand and navigate social situations effectively.

Social Awareness: The ability to recognize and understand social cues and dynamics.

Communication Skills: The ability to convey information and ideas effectively.

Active Listening: The ability to listen attentively and understand others’ perspectives.

Conflict Resolution: The ability to resolve conflicts and disagreements in a constructive manner.

Collaboration: The ability to work effectively with others towards a common goal.

Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

Leadership: The ability to guide and influence others towards a shared vision or goal.

Networking: The ability to build and maintain relationships with others.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by nine.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

8) In your opinion, which cognitive traits were exhibited?

Analytical Thinking: The ability to break down complex problems and analyze them systematically.

Critical Thinking: The ability to objectively evaluate information and make reasoned judgments.

Problem-Solving Skills: The ability to identify and implement effective solutions to problems.

Creativity: The ability to generate new and innovative ideas.

Memory: The ability to retain and recall information.

Attention Span: The ability to focus and sustain attention on a task or stimulus.

Learning Agility: The ability to quickly learn and adapt to new information and situations.

Decision-Making Skills: The ability to make sound decisions based on available information.

Cognitive Flexibility: The ability to switch between different modes of thinking and adapt to changing circumstances.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by nine.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

Case Study #2: Because I Said So (WIP)

Case Study #3: The Pursuit of a Lie (WIP)

Case Study #4: Remediation Road (WIP)

Case Study #5: The Builder’s Commandments

On Ethics

This branch of Philosophy has been debated, expounded, and developed throughout the ages. The values of an individual need to be found within his person. Largely, however, it is the mindset of a group that the individual ends up acquiring. Whatever the group may value or hold dear, then these ideas are passed on to the individual, the next generation and so forth. In order to check the group, the individual must take a step back, introspect and find what his values, morals and thoughts are. If not, a collectivist mindset will continue to press on without a check and balance system. (History can attest to what I am stating; see 1940’s European group-thought mindset.) One must learn to think for himself and use his intellect, reason, and reality to determine his stance on life. Only then can the individual truly and without bias state his ethical code. Only then can a telling life be led; one that is conscious, driven and not pushed along without establishing itself. On this, I call Ethics.

On Reading

Truly my first love. I distinctly remember the excitement I felt when opening a new book by one of my favorite authors, or any author for that matter. The crisp edges of a page, the sharp spine that had yet to be broken; all gave rise to a thrilling sense of wonder at what I was about to discover. The sentence structure, semantics and plot all provided my young mind with a background for my imagination to take hold. As time progressed, this thirst for reading did not diminish. I read more, diversified my library while pressing upon my peers the importance of this outdated mode. In hindsight, I can honestly say that the act of reading enabled my conviction to become more rounded, my communication skills to become more precise; thus, leading to an ability to hold a conversation within any age group on any number of topics. So, give it a shot… Turn off the TV, step away from Facebook and find a book that captures your attention. It will require thinking but I am confident that your imagination will be fueled by an undying fire. (All while bringing a smile to your countenance). On this, I call Reading.

On Art

Full disclosure, I am not an artist. I merely slapstick paint or push a pen around and hope for the best. However, this simple act of artistic expression, or creating something from naught, allows the individual to express his/her innermost. Picasso stated that, “the purpose of art is washing the dust of daily life off our souls.” I concur with his stance even though his art is above my head. All too often the grind of life, jobs, responsibilities, and care-giving stifle the true creative species that we are. Our nature is geared toward solving problems in an ever-changing environment. By taking a moment to pause, contemplate and create, we effectively give a voice to our disposition. The calculated creation of technology is put on hold while we explore the workings of our mind and soul. The therapy this act provides is a welcome respite that can lead to moments of self-satisfaction and peace. This aim at artistic expression is not to appease others but to introspect the values and virtues that one, sometimes unknowingly, holds dear. Moreover, if all else fails in this endeavor, at least you have paused to think while examining your soul. On this, I call Art.

On Self-Discipline

            We learn from an early age that while our parents or caregivers are there for our well-being, they cannot be there to guide you at all points in your life. It is up to the individual to take responsibility for their actions, thoughts, and ideas if they are to live a meaningful life. Discipline is a necessary component to achieve this sense. Every day you are faced with challenges and questions on how you want to live your life: Do I get up today? Will I be productive or lazy? Am I to take care of the one body I possess? (A small sample size of questions yet the point is made in such.) Our ability to face reality and move forward is self-discipline. To better oneself, one must have this state of mind. Nothing is promised to our Human hence our need to form our thoughts and choose the direction in which we want to discover. Nothing is life that is worth something, comes easy. As a result, you will have to do things in life that you do not want to do. Nevertheless, you do them because the path to betterment begins with action. On this, I call Self-Discipline.

On Motivation

To be sure, one must take unconditional advantage when this state of mind is upon you. The energy it provides is likened to a transcendental experience. It arrives at varying times unless one is able to harness it permanently. By this, I mean one has to have a focus that is undeterred and unrelenting in itself and absolute in its drive. Man has studied this trait in earnest and much self-help has been written on it; yet, as evident when one looks around, it is still a mystery to many. I do not have an answer as to why this occurs… By writing on this topic, I merely want to bring attention to it. This trait of being walks closely with the following: ambition, determination, and resolve. To possess all these traits would be the result of a paramount, powerful individual. An individual who understands himself, his environment and what must be done to change or manipulate the situation. Regardless of the direction the individual pursues, having a motivating drive will surely lead them to their goal. Grasp this state and never let go. On this, I call Motivation.

On Elation

The state in which all would like to permanently dwell. However, this uplifting and joyous emotion is often short lived as reality enters the equation. Most find this state of being an external stimulus; as a result, they require increased incentives to hold on to it. With the constant advancement of our society, our Human is bombarded with images and ideas on how we should be. A never-ending deluge of dejection is often the result of this barrage… “How” and “Why” are most common beginnings to questions in which no answer can be derived. The key to this epidemic is found in oneself. The blissful awareness that I am the harbor and ship of my thoughts and thus I control my state of emotion. As a result, one will then step back and see the rat maze in which we are shrouded. To look beyond and find the wheel that is our Turning, which, when discovered, leads to a peaceful reckoning. This highly important moment is the beginning to find our calling, purpose, and hope in humanity. On this, I call Elation.

On Self-Respect

By the very fact that we exist, it should behoove the individual to respect his person. This respect, that each individual needs to learn for himself, can only be achieved once we learn to accept and love the person we are. Once done, the individual’s actions, thoughts and work will follow suit in a similar manner. However, we see it throughout history as well as our present time that man struggles with this concept. His production and time spent is the perception on which self-respect is to be measured. We are limited to a finite amount of time on Earth; then, as if we were not even here, time continues, and the man is forgotten. Yet, his efforts and his work can live immortally if produced in the manner of his abilities. Meaning, the respect in which we endow ourselves is key to the productivity produced. A wasteful attitude will destroy any chance of leaving a mark, and thus any chance of obtaining self-respect. Once we learn to respect our own person then we are able to truly respect others. This is called Self-Respect.

On Knowledge

I refer to this concept as a state of mind because the precursor to knowledge is a love of learning. The core of our Human is an innate desire to seek out information. This should be considered a never-ending pursuit of bettering oneself and not a stagnant state of being. Man must continue to learn, to expand his boundaries, diversify his thought and, once he acknowledges his limitations on a particular subject, continue to seek out that which he does not know. The material one seeks is subjective yet striving for knowledge is relative to us all. Our pursuit of something leads us to determine the course of our existence. Thus, bringing me back to my above-stated topic. This pursuit is knowledge. Knowledge from experience, life, education, friendship, desires, wants, needs, morality, books, etc. The list is endless because what we are each seeking is individual to us. One must learn to seek out his knowledge, to grasp it and continue with his search for more. On this, I call Knowledge.

On Empowerment

In our technologically advanced society, where “give me now” is the predominant mindset, children do not understand the value of patience, dedication and the antiquity involved in getting where we are as a nation. History is often a glazed eye subject for them while not understanding the importance in lessons learned. To youth, anything they desire is but a computer click away… This does not fully invoke the thought process nor mental capabilities of which they are capable. To unplug, step back and think. To introspect on life, history, and advancement. By inventing a “click here” society, the microwave generation exists solely in the present. Not concerned with past mistakes and successes, only worrying, and concerning themselves with the face of today. Then, their future becomes their present and they are left bewildered and untrained on how to manage. My goal is to invoke this thought mechanism that has been replaced with http://www.insert-your-website-here.com. THINK young people and learn from history! On this, I call Empowerment.

Case Study #6: In Defense of Sad Stories

Michael Lance Whisenant

In Defense of Sad Stories

In Defense of Sad Stories

            On February 12, 2021, I lost my best friend. I have had to deal with the death of loved ones throughout my life but had seemingly forgotten what heartache felt like until recently. I had suspected for a couple months that his death was imminent if not for a recovery that seemed far-fetched. In truth, the doctor had tried all that she knew when he was first admitted to the hospital (and for that I was grateful). He improved a bit but the shine in his eyes and the expression on his countenance was not the same… However, he knew that I still held out hope for him and as such, he did his best to soldier on like the loyal friend he had always been. Was I being selfish? Absolutely. I was not ready to lose such an integral part of my being.

“I think he is losing weight,” my wife would say to me.

“He is,” was my reply, “but I think we just need to find the right diet for him.”

“His energy level and demeaner has completely changed babe, you need to start thinking on what comes next. This isn’t fair to him, and you know it.”

“I know…”

Over the next couple of weeks, his weight continued to drop, and a pleading look entered his eyes when he and I were alone.

(I’m in pain and I can’t continue to do this. Please help me Daddy…)

“I know buddy, Daddy hears you. We will go see the doctor again and see what she has to say.”

Three days later.

Thursday, February 11, 8:44am

“Good morning! It’s Doc. He is about the same. He’s resting but does not have an interest in food this morning. He pulled out his IV last night, so we are going to have to replace it. We are going to focus on getting him to eat and see if we can improve how he feels.”

“Okay thank you for the update. If he does not eat, I can bring him the deli turkey meat that he likes. Just let me know what I need to do,” I replied woefully.

“Yes, bring it so I can see what he does with that (especially after we have given him stomach meds).”

Thursday, February 11, 7:04pm

“Has he done any better?”

“He didn’t eat for me today, but he has some canned stew and a few pieces of deli meat,” she said. “He is resting and doesn’t seem agitated and uncomfortable like yesterday. We were finally able to get urine from him as he would not urinate for us yesterday. There is bacteria and red/white blood cells indicating the infection has returned. We are giving him powerful antibiotics, and I am hoping they kick in fast.”

“Okay thank you for the update as I know you are very busy. Let me know tomorrow what our options are. Have a good night.”

Friday, Feb 12, 9:42am

“Hi Doc, is he showing any signs of improvement?” I texted apprehensively.

10:04am

My phone rings.

“Hi Lance, it’s Doc. He pulled his IV out again last night and he did not touch the food we had left for him…” There was more to be said but her words began to fade as the truth finally sank in: It’s time.

“Doc, I can’t keep doing this to him. It’s not fair, and I can no longer be selfish in my desires. It is time for us to let him go. When can I come up there?”

“I can get a room set up so y’all can spend some time with him. Can you be here at 10:45?”

“Yes,” I replied. “I will call Tiffany and have her meet me at the clinic.”

I hung up while fighting back tears… This was not how I imagined the end would be when he showed up on our driveway four years ago.

“Hey Boss, I have to leave work for a bit,” I stated as I gathered my wallet and keys. “I will be back later this afternoon.”

I wish I could say that I thought on the good times during the ten minutes it took to drive to the clinic. However, at that moment, the singular thought that consumed my attention was: This is it. These are my final moments to spend with my confidant and collaborator. The one who never judged and always had my back. The friend who smiled and jumped with joy at the sight of me. My precious, sweet baby boy would soon meet his maker.

My cherished Snacks was having to be put down…

Upon arrival, my heart was beating furiously, and my legs seemed to have added weight. Everything seemed to be happening quickly, and this was not what I had expected. Don’t the movies say things are supposed to slow down as our perspective narrows and we absorb our surroundings?

Yeah, that didn’t happen.

“Hi. Did Doc tell you what we were doing today…?” I queried.

“No,” the receptionist replied.

“Oh. We are having Snacks put down. She said she would get a room set up for us so we could spend some time with him.” I explained.

As I was directed to the room in which our final meeting place would be, I noticed the other patrons with their animals, the happy expressions on both faces, and felt my heart regress a little further into its inner sanctum. Was I jealous of their happiness as my grief took hold? Maybe, but I don’t think so. In truth, I find it difficult to try and give voice to the rawness at which I felt. It certainly felt tangible and seemed ripe to dominate my thinking if I only let it; palpable for sure. The evidence of its weight was not lost on the Vet Tech as she escorted me to my decision.

“We will bring him in here in just a few minutes,” she stated.

“Should I call my wife now and have her head this way?” I asked.

“Yes. Call her now.”

Sigh.

“Hey. You need to come now. They are about to bring him to the room so we can spend some time together before he goes.”

“Okay, I am heading that way.”

Bless my wife. She is the definition of perky with a side of caffeine. And yes, I wrote that correctly. But this day, as one would imagine, the spunk was not present in her voice, and the liveliness of her spirit was dulled.

“Hey babe. They should be bringing him here shortly,” I said when seeing her.

“Okay. I’m glad I was able to get off work and be here. I thought I might not be able to.”

We huddled together in our chairs, each with our own thoughts as we waited anxiously for the sound of toenails on painted concrete. I could hear muffled conversations happening in the hallway but did my best to tune out anything other than clink, clink, clink, so as not to miss his arrival.

“Here he comes,” I directed at Tiff.

The door opened and he was led in.

“Hey Snacks, hey Big Boy! Daddy missed you baby!” I exclaimed while kissing his forehead and face. “Mommy and Daddy are here buddy.”

He had lost more weight and was down to 75lbs (as compared to the 100lbs he weighed only a few months ago). His downcast eyes tried to hide the pain in which he felt, but I knew. See, I had studied those eyes, that face, and those features. I knew every inch of him and could sense that he was tired of fighting and wanted the final sleep in which we all are promised.

“I see you buddy… Daddy knows.” I whispered in his ear. “Mommy and Daddy love you so much Snacks. Thank you buddy, thank you.”

We continued to pet and talk to him and did our best at reassuring him that Mommy and Daddy were here with him and that we loved him. We kissed his eyes, his nose, his ears, his slobbery jowls that ruined many a pair of pants, and we accepted that our beautiful boy would soon be leaving.

“He won’t feel any pain, and it will be just like he is going to sleep,” Doc assured us.

The needle was inserted, and the plunger pulled back. Blood darted in the syringe as proof that a vein had been found.

“Okay, here we go,” she said.

Slowly, the plunger began pushing the death dose throughout his system. As the syringe emptied, Snacks took his final breath and felt no more pain.

Afterword

February 23, 2021 8:45pm

Ten days have passed. Ten days and I think about him and the times we had together… The many days of destroying tennis balls or ripping blankets while besting Daddy in a tug-of-war match. Oh, the fun we had! I knew from the moment I saw you that we would be best friends and that we would play and love each other. Remember when I would escape from my collar and you would have to chase me down the street? Or when you would try and mow the yard and I would bite the tires thinking it was trying to hurt you? Those were the best days! I remember the steak you and Mommy fed me on my birthday and the balloons you let me pop. The nights when we would watch movies until I reminded you that it was 9:00 and time for bed. Remember Daddy? How about when Mommy tried to take me to PetSmart only to realize I was too strong for her to handle (I almost got those hamsters too!)? And how you always found the right spot when rubbing my belly? I will never forget those moments we shared and the time we had with each other. I’m in a better place now and you don’t need to worry about me. So, don’t cry Daddy, or feel like you need to defend a sad story. Our time was special, and for that, I want you to feel joy.

                                                                                                            With all my love,

                                                                                                                      Snacks

Case Study #7: Break Me Down (sample)

The run was a 50-mile obstacle course, and it beat me up good. The climb up Pinnacle Mountain is straight up and you are climbing boulders. It is a beautiful view at the top, but I couldn’t linger for too long because I still had another forty-four miles to go.

The actual running trail is more rock than dirt (I kicked at least fifty rocks that were disguised, or I just didn’t see them; my toes took a bruising but fortunately my shoes are quality and have a solid toe-guard) and at Mile 17 or 18 is when we started crossing streams. Some streams you were able to cross from wet rock to wet rock and others you just had to plunge in and get soaked from the knee down. One steam, more like a river, had a rope you had to grab in order to cross it. I was running with wet feet for the duration of the run, and I didn’t have time to change my socks for this reason: In my haste to leave the aid station at mile sixteen, I missed the sign for the trail and ended up running .4 miles in the wrong direction. I then had to run .4 miles back, find the trail, and try to make up the time I lost.

And to top it off, my IT Band flared up in my left knee on mile twenty. I had to land and push with my right leg and swing my left leg so it would bear only minimal impact. Fortunately, I could power walk, and it didn’t hurt so I was speed-walking 15-min miles to make sure I made the checkpoint cutoff times. When I was falling behind my minimum 15-min pace, I would do a shuffle-style run to make up time. I couldn’t do this for more than one hundred yards at a time, or my IT band would scream at me.

Oh, and I rolled my right ankle at mile forty. At that point in the race, I didn’t care about the pain or if I had to crawl across the finish line; I was going to accomplish my singular goal of finishing the race. The cutoff time was 13-hours, and me and another guy walked in with 10-15 minutes to spare. Of the 50-mile runners who finished the race, I tied for last, and I have never been prouder to finish in last place

Results

TBD

Discussion

TBD

Conclusion

TBD

Emergent Study Questions

1. Investigating the process of “moments of Enlightenment”:

   – What are the cognitive and affective factors that contribute to these moments of deep understanding?

   – How can technology support the occurrence of moments of Enlightenment?

   – Can moments of Enlightenment be intentionally facilitated through specific instructional design strategies or interventions?

2. Understanding the mechanisms of forgetting and understanding loss:

   – What are the underlying cognitive processes involved in the loss of understanding over time?

   – How can technology mitigate the effects of forgetting and support the retention of understanding?

   – Can targeted interventions be designed to prevent or reduce understanding loss?

3. Examining the role of memory degradation in the learning process:

   – How does memory degradation impact the transfer and application of understanding in real-world contexts?

   – Can technology-based interventions alleviate memory degradation and enhance long-term retention and application of understanding?

   – What are the optimal spacing and timing of reinforcement to combat memory degradation and support sustained understanding?

4. Exploring the interplay between repetition, reinforcement, and understanding:

   – How can technology leverage repetition and reinforcement strategies to enhance the development and retention of understanding?

   – What are the optimal timing, frequency, and modality of repetition and reinforcement to maximize learning outcomes?

   – Can personalized and adaptive learning technologies tailor repetition and reinforcement to individual learners’ needs and learning styles?

5. Investigating the impact of adaptive learning technologies on understanding:

   – How effective are adaptive learning technologies in promoting personalized and tailored learning experiences?

   – What are the design considerations and challenges in developing adaptive learning technologies that optimize understanding and learning outcomes?

   – Can adaptive learning technologies support learners in identifying and addressing gaps in understanding?

6. Understanding the transfer and application of understanding:

   – How can technology facilitate the transfer and application of understanding to real-world contexts?

   – What are the factors that influence successful transfer and application of understanding acquired through failures?

   – Can technology-supported simulations and virtual environments enhance the transferability of understanding?

7. Exploring the role of learning analytics in supporting continuous improvement:

   – How can learning analytics provide insights into understanding development and learning progress over time?

   – How can learners use learning analytics to monitor and regulate their understanding and learning strategies?

   – What ethical considerations need to be addressed when collecting and analyzing learning analytics data related to understanding and failures?

8. Investigating the impact of social and collaborative learning platforms:

   – How can social learning platforms and communities of practice support the sharing, application, and reinforcement of understanding?

   – What are the optimal design features of technology-supported collaborative learning environments that enhance understanding?

   – Can technology facilitate collaborative problem-solving and knowledge sharing to promote deeper understanding and learning from failures?

These study questions and research directions provide avenues for further exploration and advancement in understanding how humans learn from failures, retain understanding, and continuously improve their learning outcomes using learning technologies. Researchers can delve into these areas to expand our knowledge and develop practical strategies for enhancing learning experiences.       

References (WIP)

  • Brainpower
    • Personal journals
    • Interviews
    • Experience
  • Journal articles
  • Textbooks
  • The Internet

Appendix A

HBBp

Hypothesis

Humans are an imperfect Learning Technology and learn by failing.

Conjecture

Failing comes before learning.

Every time we fail, we gain experience.

Learning occurs after we fail, and before we experience Enlightenment.

Enlightenment occurs when the lesson is learned thus leading to an understanding of the learning process.

Learning is lost when the lesson is forgotten.

Memory degradation is when the lesson learned is forgotten.

We then fail, and the process repeats.

If true, then:

Learning occurs between failures.

Understanding occurs when our gained experience produces a moment of Enlightenment.

Understanding is lost when the original lesson is forgotten.

Memory degradation is a loss of understanding.

We then fail, and the process repeats.

Appendix B

HBBpCL

Fail ->

Experience gained,

fail again ->

experience gained,

fail again ->

experience gained,

Understanding occurs.

Lesson is forgotten ->

            Memory Degradation is a loss of understanding.

Fail ->   process repeats

Insert Miro flowchart

Appendix C

Human Baseline Builder Survey (HBBsu)

Instructions: For this assessment, please be as detailed as possible when answering the qualitative questions. If you are wanting to conduct this assessment to determine your personal Baseline, write three (3) personal stories in which you can state the following with a high degree of confidence: I learned my lesson. Score yourself and keep the result confidential so not to bias your reviewers. Locate two (2) people to read your stories and determine whether they think you learned your lesson. Add the reviewer’s scores together and subtract your self-score. The result potentially indicates your degree of learning in the situation being discussed.

Baseline (B) Question

Qualitative

1) In your own words, what is the lesson being taught?

Lance’s Learned Lesson (LLL) Question

Qualitative

2) Do you think Lance learned his lesson? Why or why not?

Quantitative

2a) Do you agree or disagree that Lance learned his lesson?

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

Lance’s Turning Point Constant (LTPc) Question

Qualitative

3) Do you think Lance experienced a “turning point” or shift in his thinking that caused him to change his behavior? Why or why not?

Quantitative

3a) Do you think Lance experienced a “turning point” or shift in his thinking that caused him to change his behavior?

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

The Forgotten Lesson Conundrum (FLc)

Qualitative

4) Do you think Lance will forget the lesson he learned? Why or why not?

Quantitative

4a) Can we anticipate that Lance will retain the lesson he learned?

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

Appendix D

Human Baseline Builder Experience Factors Survey (HBBef)

Please highlight all that apply.

5)In your opinion, which personality traits were exhibited?

Extroversion: Outgoing, sociable, and energized by social interactions.

Introversion: Reserved, reflective, and energized by solitude and quiet environments.

Openness: Imaginative, curious, and open to new experiences and ideas.

Conscientiousness: Organized, responsible, and focused on achieving goals.

Agreeableness: Kind, cooperative, and considerate of others’ needs and feelings.

Neuroticism: Prone to experiencing negative emotions such as anxiety, mood swings, and irritability.

Ambition: Driven, determined, and motivated to achieve success.

Optimism: Positive outlook, hopeful, and confident in the future.

Resilience: Ability to bounce back from setbacks and adapt to challenges.

Empathy: Ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

Assertiveness: Confident and self-assured in expressing thoughts, needs, and opinions.

Creativity: Ability to think and express oneself in original and innovative ways.

Curiosity: Eagerness to explore, learn, and seek new knowledge and experiences.

Flexibility: Adaptability and willingness to adjust to changing circumstances.

Patience: Ability to remain calm and composed in difficult or frustrating situations.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by fifteen. Then, add the reviewer’s scores together and subtract your self-score. The result potentially indicates which human characteristics were present during the learning experience.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

6) In your opinion, which emotional traits were exhibited?

Emotional Resilience: The ability to bounce back from adversity and maintain emotional well-being.

Emotional Awareness: The ability to recognize and understand one’s own emotions.

Emotional Regulation: The ability to manage and control one’s emotions effectively.

Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

Compassion: Showing care, concern, and kindness towards others.

Emotional Expressiveness: The tendency to openly express emotions.

Emotional Stability: The ability to remain calm and composed in stressful situations.

Emotional Flexibility: The ability to adapt and adjust emotions based on different situations.

Emotional Intelligence: The overall ability to perceive, understand, and manage emotions.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by nine. Then, add the reviewer’s scores together and subtract your self-score. The result potentially indicates which human characteristics were present during the learning experience.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

7) In your opinion, which social traits were exhibited?

Social Intelligence: The ability to understand and navigate social situations effectively.

Social Awareness: The ability to recognize and understand social cues and dynamics.

Communication Skills: The ability to convey information and ideas effectively.

Active Listening: The ability to listen attentively and understand others’ perspectives.

Conflict Resolution: The ability to resolve conflicts and disagreements in a constructive manner.

Collaboration: The ability to work effectively with others towards a common goal.

Empathy: The ability to understand and share the feelings of others.

Leadership: The ability to guide and influence others towards a shared vision or goal.

Networking: The ability to build and maintain relationships with others.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by nine. Then, add the reviewer’s scores together and subtract your self-score. The result potentially indicates which human characteristics were present during the learning experience.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

8) In your opinion, which cognitive traits were exhibited?

Analytical Thinking: The ability to break down complex problems and analyze them systematically.

Critical Thinking: The ability to objectively evaluate information and make reasoned judgments.

Problem-Solving Skills: The ability to identify and implement effective solutions to problems.

Creativity: The ability to generate new and innovative ideas.

Memory: The ability to retain and recall information.

Attention Span: The ability to focus and sustain attention on a task or stimulus.

Learning Agility: The ability to quickly learn and adapt to new information and situations.

Decision-Making Skills: The ability to make sound decisions based on available information.

Cognitive Flexibility: The ability to switch between different modes of thinking and adapt to changing circumstances.

Add the total number of traits selected and divide by nine. Then, add the reviewer’s scores together and subtract your self-score. The result potentially indicates which human characteristics were present during the learning experience.

Self-score:

Judgment score 1:

Judgment score 2:

Appendix E

HBBp Codebook

LLL Key

Red = Base Learning

Yellow = Minimum Learning

Green = Target Learning

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

LTPc Key

Red = Base Understanding

Yellow = Minimum Understanding

Green = Target Understanding

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

FLc Key

Green = Lesson Learned

Gray = Undecided

Red = Lesson Not Learned

0 = Strongly Disagree

1 = Disagree

2 = Somewhat Disagree

3 = Neutral

4 = Somewhat Agree

5 = Agree

6 = Strongly Agree

Appendix F

HBBef Codebook

Personality Traits

  • 15/15 = 100% of (p)traits were exhibited during the lesson (open personality).
  • 9-14/15 = 60%-93% of (p)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly open personality).
  • 5-8/15 = 33%-53% of (p)traits were exhibited during the lesson (neutral personality).
  • 1-4/15 = 6%-26% of (p)traits exhibited during the lesson (slightly closed personality).
  • 0/15 = 0% of (p) traits were exhibited during the lesson (closed personality).

Emotional Traits

  • 9/9 = 100% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (emotionally available)
  • 6-8/9 = 66%-88% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly emotional available).
  • 3-5/9 = 33%-55% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (emotionally neutral).
  • 1-2/9 = 11%-22% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly unemotionally unavailable).
  • 0/9 = 0% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (emotionally unavailable).

Social Traits

  • 9/9 = 100% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (socially available).
  • 6-8/9 = 66%-88% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly socially available).
  • 3-5/9 = 33%-55% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (socially neutral).
  • 1-2/9 = 11%-22% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly socially unavailable).
  • 0/9 = 0% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (socially unavailable).

Cognitive Traits

  • 9/9 = 100% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (cognitively available).
  • 6-8/9 = 66%-88% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly cognitively available).
  • 3-5/9 = 33%-55% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (cognitively neutral).
  • 1-2/9 = 11%-22% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (slightly cognitively unavailable).
  • 0/9 = 0% of (e)traits were exhibited during the lesson (cognitively unavailable).

Alignment is All You Need

In a 2016 interview, Charles Fadel, the Center for Curriculum Redesign founder, stated “from the times of Socrates and Confucius, it has been obvious that what makes people successful in life is not only what they know and how skillfully they use their knowledge, but also how they behave and engage in the world. In other words, their character” (Rubin, 2017, p. 18). In my previous work as an Educational Specialist, I had the privilege of collaborating with a group of 100 middle-school students from low-income and first-generation backgrounds. These individuals had been identified as having the potential to excel in college yet required additional support to fully realize their capabilities. Through this experience, I gained a deep appreciation for the unique challenges that these students face and the importance of providing targeted resources and guidance to help them succeed. As it relates to this article, I would like to share a learning activity that was highly popular among the students. This activity provided them with an evidentiary roadmap based on their self-identified personality traits and paired their responses via a career interest survey.

The learning activity that was created has its roots in several different areas that I had previously explored while working with middle and high school students. The title of the activity, The Road to Character, shares the same name as the book by David Brooks. In it, Brooks describes the two Adams, Adam I and Adam II, and how each represents human nature. Adam I is career driven, while Adam II seeks to find inner peace. Brookes provides biographical sketches of important figures throughout our human history and how each overcame personal failures and/or weaknesses to then obtain greatness. In essence, each example was humbled by life before continuing along the path to good character and transformation. After my initial reading of the book several years ago, I immediately went out and purchased a hardback first edition. I loved the style in which it was written and felt the message throughout the book was highly important for young people to grasp at an early age.

Cue the next phase and how I translated it for middle school students. For 7th graders, I had them complete a Personal Values Identification form in which they picked their five most important values and why they chose them. From there, they would then complete a basic Holland Code test in which potential job seekers are divided into six personality types: Realistic, Investigative, Artistic, Social, Enterprising, and Conventional. I would then choose their highest three scores to determine their Holland code (SIR, AIC, ESI, etc.), and would then match that score with career fields that align with their code. My “food for thought” question was: Are your values and personality aligned with your career interests? Only you can know and decide.

For 8th graders, we went a step further and built upon the results obtained from the prior year. The students would complete a Career Clusters Interest Survey that asked them to choose: 1) the activities they liked doing, 2) personal qualities that described them, and 3) school subjects they liked. The survey was arranged in 16 boxes with each box correlating to a different Career Cluster. So, for example, if a student circled 10 activities, qualities, and school subjects within a particular box (and that box was the highest score), I would then align it with a career field (Business Admin & Management, Human Services, IT, etc.). At this point, I would access the Occupational Outlook Handbook (OOH) and compile a portfolio for the student detailing the job summary, work environment, educational requirements, future job outlook, similar occupations, etc. My goal for these activities was to put tangible data into their hands at a young age so they could have a specific reason to focus on their education.

The 8th graders who completed the assessment graduated in May 2021. Had I stayed within that career, some follow-up questions I would have asked them would be:

  • Are your career interests still the same as when the assessment was completed?
  • What solidified your career choice or caused you to change it?
  • What career resources would you have added to your high school career?
  • Were you able to do any job shadowing?
  • Do you feel like you have a good starting point to start your post-secondary education?

My thoughts were that the information garnered from these questions would allow educators to focus on what works, and what needs improvement. What better way to gain this information than from those who recently went through the process? Also, with these students largely being LIFG students, we have the potential for generational change by impacting educational and career decisions.

By aligning personal values and character traits with potential career paths, students can gain a deeper understanding of themselves and their goals, potentially leading to a greater sense of fulfillment and happiness in life. Remembering my own days in middle school, it felt at times that I was simply going through the motions of attending school without fully realizing what I was working towards. If we as educators can provide tangible and relevant data as it relates to the often-heard question of “why do we have to learn this?”, then it is my opinion that students will begin to shift their mindset to that of a determined and self-motivated individual working towards a defined goal.

In providing this assignment, my hopes were that LIFG students would see a blueprint for how to obtain their desired career and potentially impact their family dynamics by being the first to attend and graduate college. I hope you find this activity as rewarding as I did. In closing, let’s remember our true purpose as educators in that we are helping mold the next generation by promoting independent thinking and inspiring a love for learning. While challenging at times, the reward is a citizen capable of contribution, self-preservation, and the ability to think for themselves.

Learning to Be

In looking at our current educational institutions, the majority are structured to teach to specific outcomes (i.e., teaching to the test), as this methodology was applicable to the Industrial Age. Basic literacy and numeracy were taught as essential requirements for working in factories and military service. As nations further modernized, public education systems still taught rote knowledge while emphasizing higher education institutions for those who wanted a specific skillset on which to base a career. As we further questioned our human ignorance and admitted that our prior information systems (religion, state, economy) were not sufficient to account for the wonders of modern medicine, space exploration, and computing systems, we sought to provide worldwide access to information highways via the Internet and proliferate globalization through technology and trade. Microprocessors, mobile phones, automation, and social networking condensed, connected, and concentrated our man-made systems into a technological hub that unlocked the power of the algorithm. No longer were decision-making capabilities relegated to the realm of flesh and blood, nay, we successfully offloaded this powerful mechanism to machine learning that produced incredible results built on probabilities and statistics. Why make an educated guess when mathematics can provide pattern-based predictions? Why depend on heuristics when specificity is but a computer calculation away?

As computing systems scaled up via mass amounts of data and energy, we learned that the neural nets on which our human brain operates can be applied to artificial intelligence (AI) systems that resulted in their current generative abilities. Prior to this breakthrough in deep learning, our current sense of AI capabilities was confined to narrow systems that excelled in a specific domain (ex., Deep Blue, AlexNet, AlphaGo, etc.). As witnessed by the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) models that launched in 2022 for public use, large language models (LLM’s) versatility created renewed interest and speculation concerning AI and how to best apply it to our vast range of systems. In true “cart before the horse” fashion, this advanced technology was deployed at scale before we fully understood its potential risks or prepared world governance structures for the ethical frameworks needed to ensure Gen-AI’s creator (humans) were not displaced in a changing society. And what of the data used to train these advanced models? Or, better yet, who owns AI-generated content and who is responsible if these models produce harmful content that negatively impacts a human? We are not even certain how they work! While not a complete black box, at best it’s opaque as this is the nature of reinforcement learning techniques used to train billion-parameter datasets. It’s akin to discovering fire the second time around; life changing, yet destructive if uncontrolled and misunderstood.

If we look at our current educational landscape, as this think piece is particularly concerned, we see a patchwork of responses from various institutions as it relates to implementing Gen-AI. This result is exactly as expected when presented with a novel technology that potentially disrupts the learning process. We didn’t know how to best implement it within our established systems, so many teachers were left reacting as students were all too eager to apply their generative abilities to coursework.  Currently, we see newer and more advanced AI models being developed, deployed, and open-sourced for all to use. What began as an innovative technology for those in the IT sphere has now garnered the attention of nations as evidenced by the US announcing a “private sector investment of up to $500 billion to fund infrastructure for artificial intelligence, aiming to outpace rival nations in the business-critical technology” (Reuters). This investment signaled to the rest of the world that an AI race is in progress and those who wield its true potential (Artificial General Intelligence; AGI) first, are likely to reap unprecedented benefits if aligned with our human values.

AGI, as defined by Geoffrey Hinton, uses the term to mean “AI that is at least as good as humans at nearly all of the cognitive things that humans do” (AP News). This ideal has long been the goal of computer scientists and one that seems like a potential reality soon. Leopold Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI employee and author of Situational Awareness: The Decade Ahead, stresses the importance of aligning AI systems prior to an AGI system automating the research process, thus creating superintelligent systems that dwarf our human ingenuity. While his work is beyond the scope of this article, the process of automating research is underway as a recently produced paper by The AI Scientist-v2 on compositional generalization was submitted to the Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2025), and became the first AI system to pass the same peer-review procedure as a human would. In short:

The AI Scientist-v2 came up with the scientific hypothesis, proposed the experiments to test the hypothesis, wrote and refined the code to conduct those experiments, ran the experiments, analyzed the data, visualized the data in figures, and wrote every word of the entire scientific manuscript, from the title to the final reference, including placing figures and all formatting (Sakana.ai).

This is an incredible feat and one that begs the following question: If AI systems can eventually learn and create at or beyond our current human understanding, then what role does formal schooling have in our society? While education is the subject matter of this thought bubble, the prior question can be framed for any institutional system if (when?) AGI is reached. Rather than “fight the machine,” let it have linear, algorithmic, and computational thinking. We can offload these tasks and peer back into history and ponder on the questions that brought us to this moment in time. Namely, what does it mean to be human when all our technical problems have been solved?

            Termed by Edward de Bono (1967), lateral thinking involves approaching problems provocatively so that our creative abilities can be “unburdened by what has been” (pun intended). Realistically, de Bono’s idea harkens back to a time when western thought was being influenced by Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle. Thinkers of the truest sense, these individuals laid a foundation for our freedom of thought to flourish via probing questions into human behavior, ethics, epistemology, metaphysics, and scientific inquiry. But let’s look even further back in time and focus on what allowed these great minds to develop. What was it that allowed our species to influence one another to such an extent that we are now on the precipice of creating an artificial intelligence that has the potential to surpass our level of understanding? Put simply, our communication abilities, our cooperation agilities, and our organizational willingness to work as collective sapiens. These traits allowed us to shape our future and take control of our purpose in life.

Now, as we are primed to enter a new era of potential uncertainty, I want to remind our educators of their true mission in life, i.e., the reason you chose to enter this sacred profession. You wanted to make a difference in the lives of people by helping shape their thinking. You knew that, regardless of the agenda, curriculum, or mandate being implemented, what you were truly doing was guiding a mind. It is this principle, human thinking, that needs to be developed and curated within our educational systems. When a student asks, “Why do I have to write when AI can do it for me?”, your answer can be “Because writing involves thinking and that is what we are trying to develop.” When a student asks, “Can’t I just use AI to provide the answer?”, you can respond with “It is the questioning process that matters when searching for an answer.” When teaching history, “Why do I need to know what happened in the past”, you can answer with confidence that “Understanding how we arrived at this moment in our advanced society allows us to reflect and grow together as human beings.”

In closing, it is our thinking abilities that separate us from other animals. I would encourage my fellow lifelong learners to start constructing a future that emphasizes human creativity in meaning-making. Doing so will require us to understand the value in our emotional intelligence and learn to live with mechanistic beings that perform skills at a level unattainable by humans. If we accept these conditions then we have a chance of obtaining a level of comfort and tranquility that our forefathers would say are ripe conditions to foster human relationships. For isn’t this the key to meaning in our potential new world, i.e., learning to love one another just as we are. If so, then our level of happiness should rise and in doing so, we finally find the connection that links us all.

Systems Thinking, pt. III

To conclude the Systems Thinking series, I wanted to draw attention to another book I finished reading titled A Random Walk Down Wall Street by Burton Malkiel. In it, Malkiel suggests that stocks are unpredictable in the short term and that passive investing, i.e., index funds, provide more stability in their holdings by diversifying risk across many different sectors. If, as Burton suggests, the market efficiently accounts for all known information available in stock prices, then attempting to pick stocks or “beat the market” is a futile effort for most investors as the market has already accounted for all knowable knowledge (this being especially true in our digitally connected world). Several historical examples are provided in his book that illustrate how financial bubbles, largely driven by speculation rather than value, caused great angst in society as reality caused many “castles in the sky” to come crashing down to earth (Tulip Mania, South Sea Company, Dot-Com, etc.). “How could we have been so foolish,” cried many an investor? “It seemed like a can’t miss investment,” exclaimed another! Well, as with many shiny objects and bright lights, the euphoria fades once the curtain is drawn back and we see a company’s fakeness for all it’s worth. Bernie Madoff, a classic example discussed by Malkiel, convinced investors that his returns held steady during turbulent times, even when the market was turning downwards (cue the 2008 financial crisis and we all saw his scheme for what it was).

My purpose in writing this article is due to the vast amount of attention that AI is garnering in many sectors as a transformative technology, but also in the financial markets as analysts and gurus attempt to monetize its present and future value. Generative AI is capturing our attention as more businesses are advertising its capabilities and as technology companies promote its benefits in the form of free services for consumers. We recently saw another massive investment in the US ($500 billion to be exact) as Apple seeks to “produce servers to power Apple Intelligence, its suite of AI features” (AP News). Similarly, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) announced “it will build three new chip fabrication plants, two advanced packaging facilities, and a research and development center at its complex in Arizona, growing the company’s total investment at the site to $165 billion” (Investopedia). It seems that everywhere we look, news of AI is being reported as companies position themselves for what seems to be an AI race between nations. The US was thought to have a clear advantage with this technology, only to be surprised by China’s DeepSeek V3 and R1 models (see Systems Thinking, pt. II for my thoughts on it). In short, AI has shifted from a purely business opportunity to a geopolitical priority, with governments aggressively securing their national interests. And, as history has taught us, various companies looking to take advantage of the AI train will undoubtedly begin to market their goods and services as “AI powered” or some similar variant. In this scenario, there will undoubtedly be losers whose business will fail. As described in Malkiel’s book, stay diversified, avoid speculation, and think long-term. AI will surely be a rising tide that lifts all boats. So, rather than picking the single best option, invest in broad index funds to ensure you rise with the tide. In doing so, you limit your risk of choosing incorrectly while maintaining your peace of mind.

Lastly, harkening back to Kahneman’s thoughts pertaining to System 1 and 2, if ever there were a time to invoke our System 2 process, that time is now. As nations, businesses, and consumers try to get a leg up on their deemed competition, bubbles will form as companies with no background in technology begin advertising how they are “harnessing AI” to its full potential… Just play it smart, don’t give in to FOMO, and continue investing a set dollar amount (bi-monthly or monthly preferably) into your broad market index fund and watch as your investment grows via compound interest.

AI is a technology that will surely change how we do business. However, along its path to embed itself within our markets, bubbles will form and pop.

Systems Thinking, pt. II

Disclaimer: I am not a financial guru, nor does anyone fully understand how the stock market operates. This article is my thoughts on human behavior and how Kahneman’s ideas pertaining to loss aversion and Prospect Theory, contributed to the Nasdaq dropping 3% and the S&P 500 dropping 1.5%.

Yesterday, 1/27/2025, we witnessed a massive tech sector sell-off in the stock market due to the news that DeepSeek’s AI model was “on par with similar models from U.S. companies such as ChatGPT maker OpenAI, and was more cost-effective in its use of expensive Nvidia chips to train the system on troves of data” (AP News). We saw Nvidia, a giant in terms of creating graphic processing units (GPU’s), lose roughly 600 billion in market value and a 17% drop in stock price (Yahoo Finance). Various other technology companies were also affected (TSM, Broadcom, Micron Technology, etc.) by the recent developments, as well as nuclear power companies that would (and still will) power the next generation of AI products in terms of compute and electricity. In short, a lot of money was lost as investors panicked and reacted to fear caused by the potential of disrupted business models as the sitting kings of AI (OpenAI, Google, Meta, etc.) were being challenged for the throne. Essentially, a new kid on the block showed up, talked smack, and instead of acting calmly and logically, our collective System 1 took control as we feared a potential loss in territory. Investors, notorious in their herd mentality, started selling without taking a moment to think through the vitality of a product such as DeepSeek, the country in which it was created, as well as how DeepSeek was built (via the open source model from Meta) using reinforcement learning methods (RL) which potentially exploits the reward function, aka reward hacking. The purpose of this brief article is not to expound on the model’s components, but to draw attention to a great example of Kahneman’s Prospect Theory, loss aversion, and the certainty effect he so aptly describes in his book: Thinking, Fast and Slow.

Prospect Theory posits that we tend to evaluate our potential losses more heavily than comparable gains. This asymmetric response is due to the individual’s reference point in terms of how they perceive their utility, aka value, from a gain or loss. As such, the decision or scenario faced by a choice is relative to the individual’s perception (this is in contrast to the expected utility hypothesis proposed by Daniel Bernoulli). Investors, and the pressure they face to appease stakeholders, reacted to incumbent uncertainty surrounding the impact of DeepSeek’s innovation on our aforementioned tech companies. In short, investors sold shares not just because of real, tangible risks but because of their aversion to potential future losses. Kahneman’s idea of the “certainty effect” then took hold as investors chose to cash out now to avoid uncertain future failures.  Then, as is common, we witnessed a classic example of herd behavior in that as prices began to drop, investors followed the crowd and further amplified the sell-off. System 1’s instinctive and emotional thinking began to further affect the market as news about DeepSeek and its potential to disrupt the AI landscape may have loomed disproportionately large in the minds of investors; availability heuristics at its finest. So, System 1 likely drove the initial panic we witnessed, while our System 2 was slower to catch up (as evident in the Nasdaq rebound of today).

In closing, let’s not forget that it was American technology that built the foundation for DeepSeek’s model to thrive. Sure, they used some interesting techniques that can be learned from, but the overreaction of our stock market yesterday could have been avoided had more thought been placed into the (more than likely) intention of China’s main goal of disrupting our economy. And, like Lucy pulling the football from Charlie Brown, we did exactly as they most likely predicted. Our prior announcement of a US AI investment and DeepSeek’s launch on inauguration day is not a coincidence. It was a timed response that signified to both nations the growing AI race and, more importantly, the need for the US to be the first to obtain Artificial General Intelligence (AGI). The world is taking notice of an AI driven future, and it is imperative that we do not yield to System 1’s impulsive nature. Thoughtful decision making is needed as yesterday was the official start of a free world race.

Systems Thinking

I recently started reading a fascinating book titled Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman. In it, he describes the two types of “systems” that our human brain has developed to make sense of our world and the actions we take to navigate it. System 1 is our fast-acting, stereotypical, bias-prone, judgmental, and reactionary mechanism that allows our species to assess threats and make split-second decisions. System 2 is our logical, rational, and thought-provoking mechanism that is in charge of validating the inputs derived from System 1; albeit with one problem. It tends to be lazy and would rather validate System 1’s processes without exerting the necessary cognitive strain of applying resources for verification of an input. Sound familiar? It is much easier to judge, operate under bias, and allow our thinking machine to take a backseat while we operate in a cruise control frame of mind. Engaging System 2 requires us to be more vigilant and cognitively aware of our surroundings, while also sorting and deciding on which mental image/thought we choose to dwell or act on. As a result, we have developed mental shortcuts, aka heuristics, that allow us to make decisions that are “good enough.” This works well in a lot of areas but can get us in trouble when we come to rely on it for situations that require specificity in the decision-making process.

So, how do we avoid mistakes in thinking when our lazy System 2 would love to validate System 1’s decisions without applying mental resources to justify the input? How do we not jump to conclusions or seek cause and effect scenarios when statistical evidence or random chance counter what our System 1 is implying? A good place to start is by accepting the existence of System 1 and 2 in mental modes of operation and recognizing that our emotional nature would like nothing more than to not engage our lazy System 2. It is much easier to allow our personal world view to stay intact and constructed without ever questioning the foundation on which it was built. However, to grow as a person and productive citizen, allowing our emotions to reign will surely lead to a common question plagued by many of us: “How did I get myself into this situation?”

Cue critical thinking and the cognitive strain it requires. Even now as I formulate my thoughts and decide which words to use in portraying my message, System 2’s requirement of my attention and the churning of my mental machinery is a process that involves parsing Kahneman’s text with my interpretation and self-awareness. Meaning, it requires effort, focus, and determination in making System 2 perform to the specifications I know it can achieve. Yet, once engaged, I find myself enjoying the effort it requires of me and the effect it has on my sense of being an industrious individual! The same principle of forcing yourself to exercise when you absolutely do not “feel” like doing so but know your future self will appreciate the effort, applies in this example. Namely, we tell System 1 to hush and tell System 2 to get its lazy ass to work because we know that doing so is in our best interest.

I have only touched on a few points made by Kahneman and I highly encourage you to read it. My reason for discussing this two-part style of thinking, One being Quick-Draw McGraw and Two being a Lazy Eddy, is to provide context for an even larger impediment that will impact our society’s decision-making process: Generative Artificial Intelligence (Gen-AI). This transformative technology has already made an impact on how we obtain and dispense with information, and on January 22, 2025, the US “announced a private sector investment of up to $500 billion to fund infrastructure for artificial intelligence, aiming to outpace rival nations in the business-critical technology” (Reuters). Project Stargate, funded by SoftBank, OpenAI, Oracle, and MGX, are set to begin building massive data centers in the great state of Texas with the purpose of supporting “the re-industrialization of the United States but also provide a strategic capability to protect the national security of America and its allies” (Stargate). Speaking of national security, it was only last month, 12/24/24 to be exact, that Anduril Industries, a defense technology company, partnered with OpenAI to announce “a strategic partnership to develop and responsibly deploy advanced artificial intelligence (AI) solutions for national security missions” (Anduril). Now, couple all of these new developments with the impact Gen-AI has had on our education industry, and we are fully ripe for a future in which algorithmically fueled machines are all too available to provide System 2 with a permanent vacation…

Paradigm Shift

To start, let this be the first blog post, in a series of posts, in which our human curiosity meets the future of technology. In doing so, we can reflect on our co-dependent relationships with our technologies and how, through simple allegories, we can better understand the nature of the beast we created. This beast is Artificial Intelligence (AI). And while it currently remains shackled, we are fast approaching a time when the most difficult decision we face as humanity will need to be answered: Do we unleash it? While you might think this incredible technology has already been released, and to an extent it has, we are only beginning to scratch the indelible itch of more… So, the next obvious question is, what does more look like?

Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) has been the goal of many of the leading AI companies since the realization that deep learning does indeed improve a model’s output. AGI, as defined by Geoffrey Hinton, uses the term to mean “AI that is at least as good as humans at nearly all of the cognitive things that humans do” (AP News). Now, while you might be thinking (as I do about my own intellect), that “I’m really not that smart so it would seem that obtaining AGI might not be that difficult and, frankly, it would seem that ChatGPT 4o and 4o-preview already know more than I do.”  But is it really? Or is that the stochastic parrot nature of the beast, spouting words with no understanding of their meaning? This brings us to the heart of the matter: Can a machine ever truly understand in the way humans do? While AI can process and generate language that appears coherent and contextually relevant, it’s operating on patterns and probabilities derived from vast datasets. Essentially, it’s like a highly sophisticated autocomplete function that predicts the next word based on statistical likelihood rather than genuine comprehension.

So, does the ability to mimic human language equate to possessing consciousness or awareness? Or are we projecting our own experiences onto a faceless algorithm and mistaking imitation for understanding?

This brings us to the concept of paradigms, i.e., a lens through which we can examine how revolutionary ideas, like AI and (eventually) AGI, disrupt established norms. In Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolution, the notion of a paradigm is introduced. The example discussed in that book is Newtonian mechanics which stood unchallenged for hundreds of years until Einstein’s theory of relativity. Thinking about this reminded me of two prior readings, Meno and How We Think. In Meno, Socrates and Meno are trying to settle on a satisfactory definition of virtue. Throughout the dialogue, many avenues are explored as to its potential meaning, yet a clear-cut answer is never given. We are left with Socrates saying that “virtue appears to be present in those of us who may possess it as a gift from the gods” (Meno, 2002, p. 35). His conversational style with Meno, and the rationalist method in which he approached his reasoning, was a major school of thought in 350 BC. According to Edgar (2012), “Recitation literacy was prevalent because it was a common belief that the mind was a gift from God and not to be questioned. Although scientific understandings of the mind have been postulated for centuries, it was not until the 19th century that scientific understanding of the mind started forming” (p. 1). Humans learned to read, to write, and memorize facts (mental discipline in its simplest form). Cue John Dewey and How We Think. I admit, it was not easy reading for me. In truth, I listened to much of it (thanks to technology). Still, I was able to appreciate his work and picked up a few nuggets of gold along the way; namely, reflective thought and how each idea builds on the other to form a belief. Simple enough. We do this daily, yet Dewey laid it out on paper for all to see.

We each have our experiences and our realities for thinking the way we do, right? So, my coloring of an event or new idea might not take the same hue as your coloring. Or my thoughts and beliefs might not be grounded with the same glue as yours. And that’s okay. In fact, it’s as it should be. Prior to this shift in theory, Edgar (2012, p. 2) states:

Schools in the 19th century were for preparing students for entrance into college. Those individuals who were not college bound mostly entered the workforce prior to completion of high school. Families needed children to work and to support the family unit, and education beyond “necessary” skills such as being able to read and write was viewed by the common person as a frivolous novelty for the rich.

So, just as Socrates grappled with the definition of virtue in Meno, we grapple with defining true ‘understanding‘ in machines. Dewey’s insights on reflective thought further illuminate how beliefs are formed (a process that AI attempts to mimic but may not fully replicate; yet…).

Then, the 20th century stepped in with its bipolar nature and off we went on an even more technologically advanced journey. Wars and depressions worked jointly with civil rights and technological advancements (and we reacted accordingly). New demands in the form of military aircraft and space shuttles created a need for more complex forms of learning. Think you can beat us to the moon, Russia? Get bent. We will put a man on the moon. In fact, we will make a computer small enough to carry while creating a platform on which to connect it to the world. How’s that for complex thought? The needs of time called our brains to action, and we responded accordingly. And so, behaviorism, and its forms of conditioning, gave way to cognitive theories which led us to social constructivism and where we are now in our current information overload era.

So, what now? Where are we in terms of education (i.e., thinking), and how do we receive and dispense with it? Seems we are at a crossroad in terms of our relationship with technology and just how far we are willing to use it before the master becomes the servant (or are we already there?).

In speaking on education, thinking, and the environment in which we live today, the teacher is a central figure whose role has the potential to steer students down many a career path. Speaking from my own experience, my kindergarten, first grade, and third grade teacher, each made an indelible mark on my life. All three played the role of a second mother while guiding my mind towards a love for learning (this being in the early 90’s). She would teach, write on a chalkboard, engage our mind in various hands-on activities, and move about the class to see if we were progressing in our skills. Sound familiar? Then, through our human ingenuity, computers became portable, phones became mobile, and we each caught a wave while surfing the web. Instant gratification became the name of the game as we hooked our brains to a technological nirvana. As a result, the onus seemed to shift as the instructor was no longer strictly a dispenser of information. In truth, we divorced tradition, married with technology, and allowed the instructor to assume the role of a guiding facilitator and mediator. The days of lecturing the student and being the sole source from which to obtain information were replaced with newer and younger models (and isn’t it something, wow!).

As we stand on the cusp of this new paradigm, the question isn’t just about unleashing AI, but also about redefining our roles in an increasingly automated world. Are we prepared for the consequences of this shift, or will we find ourselves chasing the very technology we’ve created?

My advice? Buckle up baby because this paradigm has already shifted.